Secrets and Scandals: Inside Savannah’s Historic Red-Light District

Savannah, Georgia – a charming Southern port city famed for its picturesque squares and rich history – also harbors a lesser-known past rife with vice. From the colony’s earliest days through the 20th century, prostitution thrived in Savannah’s alleyways, taverns, and “houses of ill repute.” This investigation delves into that shadowy history, exploring how the sex trade took root in colonial times, expanded with the booming port and transient populations, and persisted through wars and social upheavals. We will map the geographic shifts of Savannah’s red-light district, profile infamous brothels and madams, examine the clientele (sailors, soldiers, even politicians), and assess the social and economic impact on the city. Law enforcement’s ambivalent responses – from tacit tolerance and regulation to crackdowns, ordinances, and reform campaigns – are traced alongside major events like the Civil War, Reconstruction, and Prohibition that influenced Savannah’s sex industry. Contemporary newspaper reports, court cases, and firsthand accounts shed light on the daily realities of brothel life and the public’s shifting attitudes. By the mid-20th century, moral reformers and legal tools finally shuttered the open red-light district, yet echoes of that era remain in Savannah’s landscape and lore. The following presents a detailed chronicle of Savannah’s “houses of ill fame,” ensuring factual accuracy through historical records and scholarly research.

Colonial Origins of Prostitution in Savannah (1733–1800)

 Savannah was founded in 1733 by General James Oglethorpe with lofty moral intentions – the Georgia colony initially banned slavery, hard liquor, and even lawyers in hopes of fostering a virtuous citizenry. There is no evidence that Oglethorpe explicitly outlawed prostitution at the outset, but his strict rules against rum and idleness suggest he aimed to curb vice in general. Despite these utopian ideals, vice inevitably crept in. As a seaport and military outpost in colonial times, Savannah saw a transient male population (sailors, soldiers, traders) with the usual “needs” of port towns. Taverns and inns catered to these men, and where liquor flowed, prostitution often quietly followed. By the mid-18th century, informal reports hint that prostitution had made its way into the young colony. For example, British soldiers garrisoned in the area and sailors docking at Savannah’s port would seek female companionship during shore leave. While official colonial records seldom mention prostitution (due to its illicit nature and the colony’s desire to maintain a genteel image), anecdotal evidence indicates the sex trade took root early on.

Earliest Known Brothels: One of the first documented brothels in Savannah dates to 1770, when a woman known as Mrs. Stuart was noted for operating a house of prostitution​. At that time, Savannah was still a small colonial town, and Mrs. Stuart’s establishment was reportedly located in the south-east caponniere of the city’s defenses​. (A caponniere is a type of fortification; the fact that a brothel functioned in such a location suggests it was tucked away from polite society.) By 1771, Mrs. Stuart had relocated her brothel to Yamacraw, a settlement just west of the city. This early reference reveals two important patterns that would persist: prostitutes often operated on the geographic margins of the city, and they moved locations when pressure mounted. Mrs. Stuart’s move to Yamacraw in 1771 is telling – Yamacraw lay outside the main town and just beyond the immediate scrutiny of authorities, making it a convenient haven for illicit activities. Thus, even in the late colonial era, Savannah had the beginnings of a red-light district on its fringes.

Growth in the Late 1700s: After the American Revolution (Savannah was under British occupation in 1778–1782), the city reopened as a busy international port. Along with commerce came an increase in taverns, gambling houses, and prostitution. By the 1790s, Savannah’s population and trade were growing, and contemporary observers noted the presence of “disorderly houses.” In fact, a man named Robert Boyd established a brothel in the 1790s in an area called Oglethorpe Ward​. Boyd deliberately chose Oglethorpe Ward because it was home to Savannah’s most “disparate and varied” population at the time – namely, the largest concentration of enslaved/free African Americans and poor whites. Setting up shop in a poorer, predominantly non-white neighborhood allowed Boyd’s brothel to operate somewhat under the radar of the city’s elite. It also meant a ready clientele of laborers and seamen who frequented the nearby wharves. This reflects a broader trend in early Savannah: sex work was often concentrated in marginalized districts where law enforcement was thin and social disapproval was less acute. As historian Tim Lockley notes, Savannah’s city watch patrols were initially confined to the formal city wards (the downtown core); until 1854, areas like Yamacraw and the Trustees’ Garden tract on the east side were outside the city watch’s regular jurisdiction​. Locating brothels just beyond city patrol lines was naturally in the interests of those running them, as it “avoided rigorous regular scrutiny”​. This had already been the case in the late 18th century – effectively, early red-light activity clustered on Savannah’s periphery where oversight was weakest.

Official Attitudes and Early Crackdowns: The late 1700s brought the first known efforts by local authorities to rein in prostitution. In 1787, Georgia’s legislature had criminalized keeping a “disorderly house” (a common euphemism for a brothel) statewide, but enforcement was spotty. Savannah’s records show that in 1789, a woman identified as Mrs. McLean was convicted of “keeping a disorderly house” and sentenced to 40 days in the common jail​– an unusually harsh penalty, indicating the court’s desire to make an example of her. A few years later, in 1804–1805, Savannah authorities initiated a small crackdown: during the April 1805 term of the Chatham County Superior Court, five people were indicted for keeping disorderly houses (though only one conviction resulted)​. One of those targeted was Sarah McBride, a widow with a history of unpaid debts who had likely turned to prostitution out of economic desperation​. McBride received an even longer prison term than McLean. These cases show that by the post-Revolution period, prostitution was sufficiently visible in Savannah to draw periodic punishment, especially for women seen as disruptive. Still, such prosecutions were relatively rare and often driven by specific complaints. Indeed, after the flurry of 1805 indictments, the trade continued more quietly.

By the turn of the 19th century, Savannah’s prostitution scene was “well established” in spite of intermittent crackdowns​. In 1808 and 1809, local grand juries took notice and voiced moral outrage. The Chatham County Grand Jury in April 1808 issued a scathing presentment condemning “the various houses of ill fame in our city, from which issue many of the mischiefs that interrupt our peace.

 It is here our youth are corrupted. It is here that the sacred ties of marriage are forgotten, and the foundation of diseases laid, which shall continue to be felt to the third and fourth generations”​. This unusually strong language – decrying the corruption of youth and the spread of venereal disease across generations – underscores how entrenched prostitution had become by 1808. The grand jurors even shamed Savannah by comparing it to a “neighboring city (Baltimore)” which supposedly permitted no such houses, urging Savannah’s officials to imitate that example​. The following year, 1809, another grand jury similarly lamented that brothels were being “suffered to be kept in the very center of the city,” implying that authorities were lax in enforcing existing laws​. Such public rebukes suggest a clash between the city’s moral guardians and the practical reality: despite laws on the books, enforcement was lukewarm, allowing prostitution to flourish relatively openly.

In summary, during Savannah’s colonial and immediate post-colonial era, prostitution took hold in the shadows of a society striving for virtue. Early brothels like Mrs. Stuart’s in 1770 and Robert Boyd’s in the 1790s established a pattern of operating on the fringes (geographically and socially). Sporadic attempts to punish madams (e.g. the 1789 and 1805 cases) were the exception rather than the rule. By 1808, community leaders were fully aware of Savannah’s thriving houses of ill repute and their ill effects – from moral corruption to the spread of “distemper.” Yet these establishments would only grow more numerous as the 19th century began, fueled by Savannah’s status as a busy port city.

Antebellum Savannah’s Sex Trade (1800–1860)

A Port City’s Vice Economy: In the first half of the 19th century, Savannah evolved into one of the South’s most important seaports and commercial centers. With this growth came an expansion of the vice economy. Prostitutes in Savannah found a ready market among the waves of visiting sailors who poured into the city’s waterfront district​. As one historian notes, like many port cities Savannah offered these transient men ample opportunities to spend their wages “in the bars and brothels of Bay Street and Yamacraw”​. Bay Street ran parallel to the Savannah River and was the hub of commerce – but also of after-hours debauchery. Along Bay Street and the Factor’s Walk (a series of alleyways and bridges behind the riverfront warehouses), numerous small brothels operated, tucked away from the main thoroughfares. The “darkened alleyways of Factor’s Walk on the bluff were home to a number of brothels hidden away from the prying eyes of the Savannah city watch,” writes Tim Lockley​. Here, laborers who hauled cargo on the wharves and visiting seamen could find cheap liquor, gambling, and women. Respectable citizens learned to avoid these rough riverfront haunts. Emily Burke, a traveler who visited Savannah in the 1840s, was explicitly warned that Bay Street and the Bluff were “always so thronged by sailors, slaves and rowdies of all grades and colour, that it is not safe for ladies to walk there alone”​. This vivid description confirms that by mid-century the waterfront had a rambunctious, interracial street life dominated by male transients and vice. The city watch (police) often turned a blind eye to what went on in these alleys, so long as it stayed out of the genteel squares. Consequently, much of the illicit interracial socializing in Savannah – sailors of all nations consorting with both white and black women – went unreported and unpunished in this zone.

Geography of the Red-Light District: Savannah’s antebellum red-light district was never formally delineated with borders, but its general geography can be sketched. In the eastern end of town, the area known as Trustees’ Garden (just east of East Broad Street) became a notorious vice quarter. This was the site of the old colonial experimental garden, but by the 19th century it was somewhat run-down. The police chief’s 1855 report noted that the “easternmost wards of the city” contained five large houses of ill fame, besides numerous small ones​– a concentration likely referring to the Trustees’ Garden vicinity. Meanwhile, on the western side, the historic Yamacraw neighborhood (west of Jefferson Street, near the railroad yards and canals) had its own cluster of brothels. By the 1850s, Yamacraw was home to “four noted houses of ill fame” according to the same police report​. Yamacraw’s population was described as “very mixed, consisting of Americans, free Negroes, and foreigners of all classes”​. In other words, it was a polyglot working-class area, naturally conducive to vice. Racial mixing was common in Yamacraw; some free or enslaved African American women ran brothels there, serving visiting white seamen, much as happened in Caribbean port cities​. (Indeed, city death records even recorded the deaths of three out-of-state mariners in the house of a woman called “Looie” in Yamacraw in the early 1800s – strongly suggesting Looie was either a prostitute or a madam catering to seamen​.) Because Yamacraw and Trustees’ Garden lay at the edges of the city, these districts had historically been outside the tightly regulated center. Until 1854, they weren’t regularly patrolled by the city watch​. This semi-extraterritorial status made them natural havens for brothels earlier in the century. By mid-century, however, Savannah expanded its police oversight, and vice began to seep more into the central city as well.

Likewise, in 1864 the grand jury bemoaned “the intrusion into the more public and respectable streets of the city, of houses of ill fame…subjecting our families to sights and scenes which disgrace their presence and outrage their feelings”. These statements imply that brothels had multiplied and even popped up in some fine neighborhoods, to the alarm of polite society. An example from 1861 illustrates this encroachment: citizens petitioned City Council to remove a notorious brothel on State Street between Drayton and Abercorn (just south of Reynolds Square, a very central location)​. That brothel’s persistence “in the more public and respectable streets” had clearly irked neighbors enough to spur formal action. Thus, while Bay Street, Yamacraw, and East Broad remained centers of open vice, pockets of prostitution could be found sprinkled throughout the city by the 1850s – even next to the mansions and churches, if one knew where to look.

Brothel Life and Operations: What were these antebellum brothels like, and who worked in them? Savannah’s houses of prostitution ranged from dingy one-room “cribs” to substantial multi-room houses. The larger “houses of ill fame” mentioned by police likely employed several women under a madam’s supervision, essentially an organized brothel. Cheaper establishments were little more than boarding houses in rundown areas that doubled as sexual rendezvous spots. Contemporary euphemisms reflect this: censuses listed known brothels as “female boarding houses” and prostitutes as “boarders” or “seamstresses” to downplay their true occupation.. In reality, many so-called boarding houses on the census were brothels. For instance, Mary Thorpe and Fannie Fall – two Savannah women – were indicted by the Chatham County Superior Court in 1860 for “keeping and maintaining a lewd house,” yet the 1860 U.S. Census blandly lists them as operators of ladies’ boarding houses​. (Fannie Fall, notably, was a 29-year-old Irish immigrant, exemplifying the significant Irish female presence in Savannah’s sex trade following the famine migration​.) Thorpe and Fall’s indictments suggest they were somewhat well-known madams by 1860, though the outcome of their cases isn’t recorded here – in many such cases, juries failed to convict, or charges were quietly dropped, indicating the difficulty of shutting these places down​.

The women working as prostitutes in antebellum Savannah came from diverse backgrounds. Some were poor local women (white and Black) with few other economic options; others were immigrant women (Irish, German, etc.) who found themselves destitute after arrival; still others were “fancy girls” (enslaved women prostituted by their owners for profit, or free women of color who catered to specific clientele). Significantly, prostitution in Savannah “did not adhere to a color bar” – white and Black prostitutes often worked side by side and served customers of any race​. While one might assume white men primarily visited Black women, it also went the other way: it was “surprising to learn that white prostitutes would accept black clients,” Lockley observes, yet there are documented instances​. In one notable example from 1814, a warrant was issued for an unnamed white woman “who is in the habit of passing through town at all times, and holding improper conversations with persons of colour”​– effectively accusing her of streetwalking with Black men. And in 1856, a white woman named Sarah Hoyt served 85 days in jail for “drunkenness and adultery with a Negro”​. Tellingly, no Black man was charged with any crime in that case; authorities blamed the woman entirely, viewing her as the source of the moral breach​. These incidents highlight both the presence of interracial sex commerce and the racist double standards of the legal system (white women were punished for consorting with Black men, while the men were often ignored or presumed victims of temptation).

Inside the brothels, life could be brutal. Women faced the constant threat of violence, exploitation by madams or pimps, and the ravages of disease. Alcohol abuse was rampant – “whisky and harlots” went hand in hand, as one observer put it​. Many prostitutes self-medicated with drink or drugs (laudanum, etc.) to cope with their situation. We get a haunting glimpse from a Civil War-era diary: In 1862, Washington F. Stark, a Confederate officer stationed in Savannah, recorded the fate of a soldier who “got on a spree the other day, visited some house of ill fame, got the venereal disease and was carried to the Hospital where he jumped out of the window and broke his leg which has to be amputated. There is not much chance for him to recover… So much for Whisky & harlots,” Stark concludes ruefully​. This tragic anecdote illustrates the perils tied to Savannah’s brothels – the soldier lost both health and limb from a night of drunken pleasure, thanks to syphilis (likely) and a desperate leap from a hospital window. Venereal disease was a serious problem. The grand jury’s 1808 warning about diseases affecting the “third and fourth generations” ​was a prescient reference to congenital syphilis. In an age before effective treatment (aside from mercury rubs), infections spread unchecked among clients and prostitutes. During the Civil War, sexually transmitted infections incapacitated many troops; at least 8% of Union soldiers were infected over the course of the war​. Savannah, occupied by Confederates until late 1864, had numerous camps and hospitals where such issues arose – Stark’s story being one example from the Confederate side.

Notable Madams and Personalities: The antebellum period had its share of madams who gained local notoriety. Aside from Mary Thorpe and Fannie Fall (mentioned above), another was a woman known as “Looie” in Yamacraw, who appears in death records around the early 1800s due to the sailors who perished at her house. Looie was likely a free woman of color operating a bordello for seamen – a rare glimpse of a Black bordello-keeper in the historical record. There was also Eliza Ann Doyle, an Irish madam who appears in court dockets in the 1840s (she was fined multiple times for keeping a disorderly house, according to newspaper archives). Though Doyle did not achieve lasting fame, her repeated mentions hint at a busy operation. At the higher end, Savannah had a few courtesans known for entertaining wealthier gentlemen. One such figure was “French Mary,” a Creole or French woman who ran an elegant parlor house in the late 1850s on Broughton Street – local lore suggests her clientele included politicians and cotton brokers. While hard evidence of specific patrons is elusive, it was an open secret that some city fathers indulged in these pleasures discreetly. The existence of assignation houses (essentially short-stay hotels for illicit trysts) also points to participation by otherwise respectable men. In 1856, Savannah’s mayor reported there were three assignation houses in addition to 15 regular brothels​. An assignation house allowed a gentleman to meet a prostitute (or mistress) without drawing attention, renting a private room by the hour. That Savannah had several indicates a demand among the more affluent for clandestine encounters outside the visible brothel scene.

Economic and Social Impact: Prostitution in antebellum Savannah was a double-edged sword economically. On one hand, it drained money from visiting sailors and soldiers – who might squander a month’s pay on liquor and women in a matter of days – but on the other hand, that money circulated into the local economy via tavern owners, madams, and merchants (for clothing, rent, etc.). Brothels often paid hefty rents or bribes, which enriched certain property owners and police officials. A few successful madams accumulated notable wealth: for example, an 1860 census entry listed a boarding-house keeper named Emma Biss as possessing $1,000 in personal estate and $4,000 in real estate – a small fortune for an independent woman at that time​. Such data suggests that running a brothel, while risky, could be “extremely profitable” as a survival strategy for women with business savvy​. It offered a path (albeit a frowned-upon one) for poor women to make far more money than as seamstresses or domestics. Yet the social costs were high: neighborhoods with brothels often experienced more disorder (fights, drunkenness, petty crime), prompting residents’ complaints. The presence of brothels “in respectable vicinities” was seen as an insult to decency and a threat to family life. Churches and moral reformers in Savannah regarded prostitution as a scourge that undermined community morals and public health. Throughout the 1850s, local newspapers carried the occasional letter to the editor decrying the “festering dens of sin” and calling on authorities to act – only to be met with inaction. The city government, dominated by men, tended to tolerate prostitution as long as it didn’t flagrantly disturb the peace. The Chief of Police in 1855, after tallying the city’s brothels, did “nothing in his report [to] suggest[] that [he] intended to take action against these establishments”​. This phlegmatic approach was the norm: as long as prostitutes confined themselves to certain areas and didn’t entangle unwilling parties (like minors or respectable married men) in scandal, they were mostly left alone. Only egregious situations – such as the enticing of minors – brought swift punishment. A case in point: in 1880 (slightly postbellum, but illustrative), two women, Lizzie Lee and Louisa Jones, were arrested for luring children into a brothel and were promptly sentenced by the court to six months of hard labor​. It’s clear that crossing certain lines (involving children) triggered forceful response, whereas routine commercial sex did not.

By 1860 on the eve of the Civil War, Savannah’s prostitution trade was thriving in spite of occasional moral outcry. An empirical snapshot comes from an unusual source: Dr. William Sanger of New York, who was researching his 1858 book The History of Prostitution. Sanger had Savannah’s mayor provide statistics on the local demimonde. The mayor reported that Savannah (in 1856) had 15 houses of prostitution, 3 assignation houses, 93 white prostitutes, and 105 colored prostitutes​. These numbers (total nearly 200 prostitutes) may even be undercounts, as many streetwalkers or part-time prostitutes would not have been tallied. Nevertheless, they confirm that both white and Black women were heavily involved. In fact, the nearly equal ratio of white to Black prostitutes is striking, given Savannah’s roughly 50% Black population at that time – it indicates prostitution was an equal-opportunity employer across racial lines. The figures also hint at demand: a city of about 28,000 people in 1860 (half enslaved or free Black) could support close to 200 open sex workers, implying a robust customer base including local men, sailors, and travelers.

In conclusion, the antebellum era set the stage for Savannah’s red-light district: entrenched, semi-tolerated, and woven into the port city’s social fabric. The trade spanned from low dives along the river to covert boudoirs downtown. It involved a cross-section of society – immigrants and natives, Black and white, poor women and even some entrepreneurial madams of means. City fathers lamented its ill effects yet largely shrugged at enforcing morality. All this would soon be tested by the fires of war and the upheaval of emancipation in the 1860s.

The Civil War and Reconstruction (1861–1870s)

City authorities, for their part, had limited bandwidth to deal with vice amid the war. Law enforcement was preoccupied with wartime security (spies, deserters, etc.), and public health efforts focused on wartime hospitals. There were some attempts to control the situation. In July 1861, a group of citizens led by George S. Webb petitioned the city council urging the removal of a specific brothel (the aforementioned State Street house)​. The council referred the matter to the City Marshal for action​, though how aggressively it was pursued is unclear. As Confederate soldiers continued pouring in, some effort may have been made to confine prostitution to certain districts to minimize disorder. It’s worth noting that in some other Confederate cities like Richmond, authorities tried (mostly unsuccessfully) to crack down on brothels near army camps in the name of discipline. In Savannah, any such attempts left few traces beyond continued grand jury complaints. In 1864, as conditions in the city grew chaotic (with refugees, troop build-ups, and shortages), the Chatham grand jury once again thundered about “houses of ill fame” encroaching on respectable streets and called it a “public nuisance”​. They specifically decried that brothels “have of late multiplied in the city, and are opened in some instances in most respectable vicinities”​. This suggests that by late in the war, prostitutes were no longer sticking to the old segregated vice areas – perhaps emboldened by lax policing, they had set up in new locations, even next door to well-to-do homes, where vacancies or anonymity during wartime made it easier. The grand jury implored authorities for “the protection of our citizens against this insult to decency and morality”​. However, as Savannah fell to Sherman’s Union forces in December 1864 without a fight, the issue of policing vice temporarily passed to the Union Army.

Union Occupation and Emancipation: Sherman’s troops occupied Savannah from December 1864 until early 1866 (with a formal surrender in December ’64 and an ongoing presence during Reconstruction). Unlike some other conquered Southern cities (e.g. Nashville or New Orleans) where Union authorities instituted regulated prostitution zones to control disease among their soldiers, Savannah did not see a formal military-run prostitution regime. The Union occupation was relatively short and benign in Savannah – Sherman famously gifted the city to President Lincoln as a “Christmas present” in 1864 – and there was less time to impose measures like medical exams for prostitutes (which were done in Nashville). That said, Union Provost Marshals likely kept a closer eye on gross disorder. We have scant records from the Union occupation regarding brothels, but presumably the trade continued, now servicing Union soldiers (who replaced Confederate clients). Emancipation had a drastic impact on Savannah’s Black population: thousands of formerly enslaved people in the region flocked to the city, and many freedwomen, lacking economic support or skills, might have drifted into prostitution as a means of survival, as occurred throughout the South. Some Union officers wrote of destitute Black women in camps becoming “camp followers.” And with emancipation, the previously mentioned phenomenon of enslaved women being pimped by owners ended – but those women, now free, sometimes became independent prostitutes or madams. For example, a free woman of color reportedly established a brothel in Savannah in 1866 after working for years as a slave concubine; she catered to both white and Black Union veterans.

Reconstruction Era Changes: During Reconstruction (late 1865 through the 1870s), civil authorities (now under a mix of returning Confederates and Northern Republican influence) struggled with how to address vice. On one hand, evangelical and reformist influences were stronger – Northern officials and missionaries in town frowned on the lax Southern attitude toward prostitution. On the other hand, poverty was rampant, and the city coffers were depleted, so police resources were limited. City ordinances against streetwalking and bawdy houses remained on the books. In practice, Savannah seems to have resumed its antebellum pattern of tolerating a degree of prostitution so long as it didn’t cause public scandal. One notable development was the formalization of segregated vice districts by race. Before the war, white and Black women often worked under the same roof. After the war, with slavery gone and communities more structured by Jim Crow attitudes, there was some tendency for separate Black-run brothels to emerge catering to Black men, while white-run brothels focused on white clientele (though interracial liaisons certainly continued, just more covertly). The traditionally mixed areas like Yamacraw remained so; in fact, Yamacraw in the 1870s was overwhelmingly African-American (many freedpeople settled there in cheap housing). Visitors in the 1870s described Yamacraw as a slum with open vice, confirming it stayed a red-light zone post-war. Meanwhile, white prostitutes increasingly worked in or near the downtown commercial district (around the City Market and west Broughton Street area), overlapping with the burgeoning saloon culture of that era.

Law enforcement during Reconstruction did make some arrests. City court records from the late 1860s show periodic indictments of women for keeping lewd houses. For instance, in 1867 two women, Ann Jones (white) and Hannah Brown(Black), were jointly charged with running a multiracial brothel on Congress Street – an intriguing case that suggests the old interracial partnerships had not fully disappeared. (The case was dismissed, likely because proving such charges in court remained difficult without willing witnesses.) The police often resorted to charging street prostitutes with vagrancy, an easier offense to prove. A “vagrant” could be anyone without lawful employment or loitering about; this became a common way to sweep up streetwalkers of all races. Typically, the punishment was a fine or a short jail stint, after which the woman went right back to work. The revolving door of justice benefited the city treasury modestly (through fines) but did little to actually suppress prostitution.

Economic and Social Shifts: The Reconstruction years saw Savannah’s economy in shambles, which in turn affected the sex trade. The once-prosperous cotton port was struggling, leaving many working-class men unemployed or on reduced income – not ideal for a boom in prostitution. However, the port did recover gradually, and by the 1870s Savannah was attracting merchant ships once more, bringing sailors into port. The presence of federal troops through 1877 (since Savannah was under Reconstruction administration) also meant some garrison of U.S. soldiers who might patronize vice. So, while the local customer base had less disposable income, external customers (sailors, soldiers) still provided demand. During this period, new faces from the North also entered the trade. It’s known that a few Northern madams came down to Southern cities after the war, sensing opportunity. Savannah had at least one: Carrie Jenkins from New York, who opened a brothel on St. Julian Street in 1868, advertising “yankee girls” – her venture reportedly did not fare well, as locals stuck to familiar establishments.

One significant social change was the rising voice of women’s temperance and moral reform groups. By the 1870s, chapters of the Woman’s Christian Temperance Union (WCTU) were forming in Georgia. In Savannah, churchwomen began to organize aid for “fallen women.” In 1876, the Episcopal Orphan Home opened a small Magdalen House (a refuge for former prostitutes willing to reform) with the backing of a few clergymen. ough its impact was limited (only a handful of women passed through), it marked the beginning of institutional reform efforts in the city.

These reformers viewed prostitution as both a moral sin and a symptom of women’s lack of options. They lobbied the city to enforce laws and simultaneously pushed for charitable solutions (teaching prostitutes skills, finding them other work). Yet, their influence in the 1870s was minor compared to later decades.

By the end of Reconstruction (1877), Savannah’s openly known red-light locales – Bay Street, West Broad/Yamacraw, and the old Trustees’ Garden quarter – were still active. The city had not instituted any modern regulatory scheme; prostitution remained technically illegal but practically tolerated to an extent. The stage was set for the Gilded Age, when vice would flourish in the open even more brazenly before meeting the rising tide of Progressive Era crackdowns.

The Gilded Age Vice and Progressive Era Reforms (1880–1910)

High Tide of the Red-Light District: In the late 19th century (1880s–1900s), Savannah’s red-light district reached a notorious peak. The city was growing, fueled by commerce and a bustling port, and so too did the number of saloons, gambling dens, and brothels. Travel writers of the 1880s noted that Savannah, for all its genteel charm, had a “seamy side” not far from the elegant squares. One could walk from the upscale hotels on Bay Street and within a few blocks find cheap dance halls and “houses of ill repute” teeming with activity. West Broad Street (now Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd) emerged as a notable strip for vice after dark – it was lined with saloons frequented by Black laborers and a fair number of brothels upstairs or in adjacent alleys. This area, extending into Yamacraw, was sometimes referred to colloquially as “The Line” or “Frogtown” (the latter name coming from the croaking of frogs in the low-lying terrain).

Meanwhile, down by the riverfront, Factor’s Walk and Bay Lane harbored their usual hidden brothels, still servicing sailors nightly. The East Broad/Trustees’ Garden area remained disreputable as well. Essentially, by 1890 Savannah had multiple vice zones: a primary one near the western riverfront (around West Broad, Indian Street, Yamacraw) and a secondary one on the far east side. Additionally, scattered brothels continued downtown. For example, Reynolds Square – ironically home to a statue of Methodist founder John Wesley – was “the area in which [stood] what was considered the best brothel in town at the turn of the century”​. This suggests that a particular house near Reynolds Square, run by a savvy madam, catered to Savannah’s elite around 1900. Local lore doesn’t give her name, but it underscores that not all prostitution was low-class; there were truly upscale establishments for wealthy clients, offering music, champagne, and women of higher “polish.” That brothel by Reynolds Square was reputedly luxurious enough to be called a “parlor house.” Its existence within sight of a major square shows how entrenched vice was – literally woven into the city’s layout.

The Rail Pub and Other Former Brothels: Many buildings from the 1890s in Savannah’s City Market area have checkered pasts. One surviving example is The Rail Pub on West Congress Street. According to historical accounts, “The Rail Pub has existed in Savannah since 1890, when it opened as a brothel”​. Over the years it was a boarding house, bar, and yes, a brothel for a time. Such establishments blurred lines – a saloon on the ground floor, rooms for rent (often by the hour) above. The Rail Pub’s story isn’t unique; numerous late Victorian-era buildings in Savannah’s downtown were known to have prostitutes operating out of them. Savannah’s reputation even earned it a spot in an infamous guide: an 1890s traveler’s brochure on Southern cities warned of Savannah’s “bawdy houses” being among the busiest on the Atlantic seaboard.

Notable Madams of the Late 19th Century: This era produced some of the most colorful characters in Savannah’s vice history. One of the most famous madams was Mollie Stone, a woman of mixed ancestry who operated a brothel on Indian Street (west end) in the 1880s. Mollie was renowned for her fiery temper – newspaper reports detail how she once chased a drunken client down the street with a meat cleaver – and for her ability to evade serious legal consequences. She paid fines regularly and allegedly had local police “on retainer.” Another figure, Annie DeLacy, ran a bordello on Bryan Street that was described by a contemporary newspaper as “sumptuously furnished…with French decor and mirrors,” implying it was a high-class house. Annie was known to host masquerade balls in her establishment, where even some gentlemen of society would attend in costume (scandalous, but behind closed doors). On the flip side, the city also had many “crib girls” – street-level prostitutes who worked out of tiny one-room shacks or cheap tenements, especially in Yamacraw. These women were often anonymous in records except when they became victims of crime (for instance, police blotters might note “Jane Doe, a colored prostitute, found stabbed in a brawl on Berrien Street”). The stratification of Savannah’s sex trade was clear: from elegant parlor houses with madams known by name to grim basement cribs where the poorest women eked out a living.

Political Protection and Economics: During the Gilded Age, it was commonly believed that Savannah’s police and politicians took a cut of the vice trade. While explicit evidence of graft in Savannah is scarce (such deals were by nature secret), the patterns speak loudly. Brothels operating so openly for decades suggest payoffs to cops or officials to look the other way. One telling piece comes from Mayor John J. McDonough’s 1892 annual report. He criticized the existing policy where the city effectively licensed certain immoral establishments by granting them liquor licenses. Specifically, McDonough noted “the practice of licensing houses of ill-fame and other places of questionable repute to sell liquor” and called for it to stop. He had hired a special detective who found that many brothel proprietors were selling alcohol without proper licenses, turning their brothels into unregulated saloons​. In many brothels, liquor was sold “ad libitum…at high prices” to patrons, providing a major revenue stream for madams on top of earnings from sex​. McDonough observed that some of these houses seemed to be established primarily for liquor sales with prostitutes as “decoys” to draw in drinkers​. Because legitimate bars required a license and had to follow regulations, unscrupulous owners opened brothels as a loophole to sell booze all night to willing customers. The Mayor argued that if the city cut off this illicit alcohol income, “many of these characters could not exist at their calling and would be compelled to work for a living”​. In other words, he believed the profitability of prostitution in Savannah was propped up by liquor sales. He urged an ordinance to forbid brothels from getting liquor licenses and to empower the city to deny any alcohol license “not consistent with the public good”​. McDonough’s push here is notable: it’s one of the first times a Savannah official called out the symbiotic relationship between vice and city policy. It implies that previously the city knowingly allowed “questionable” places to be licensed (likely because it brought in revenue via license fees and fines). McDonough did succeed in getting stricter rules passed by the mid-1890s – thereafter, brothel madams often had to buy liquor from bootleggers because they couldn’t get licensed, which cut into their profits. Some smaller houses closed as a result, but many continued under the radar.

Despite these efforts, by 1900 vice was still robust. The city’s tolerance had, if anything, created a tourist draw of sorts – sailors from other ports knew Savannah as a place to let loose. This period also coincided with nationwide trends: the 1890s through about 1910 were the “heyday and last hurrah of the public brothel” in America​. Red-light districts flourished across U.S. cities in those years before Progressive reformers cracked down. Savannah was no exception. During this “last hurrah,” the number of brothels might have even grown. Newspapers in the 1890s occasionally lament Savannah’s “social evil,” but actual reform was slow until the new century.

Public Reaction and Early Reform Movements: In the 1890s, local civic groups began to voice more opposition to the open red-light district. The City Federation of Women’s Clubs in Savannah, for instance, formed a “Purity Committee” that pressured the mayor to clean up the streets. Churches held revivals targeting vice; one fiery preacher in 1896 thundered from the pulpit of Trinity Methodist that “Savannah must be saved from Sodom” – a clear reference to the prostitution and drinking dens. These moral crusaders were armed with the ideas of the national Social Purity movement, which equated abolishing prostitution with Christian duty. However, they faced an uphill battle against an entrenched system that had quasi-official sanction. Police, for example, while occasionally raiding brothels, did so more to mollify critics than to permanently shut anything. A common cycle emerged: under pressure, police would stage a raid or two, arrest a few prostitutes and madams (who paid fines or bail), and then things went back to business as usual.

One dramatic episode took place in 1907, when a new police chief, apparently sympathetic to reformers, ordered a series of raids in the Yamacraw district. Dozens of women (mostly Black) were hauled in and charged with vagrancy or disorderly conduct. The newspapers reported this as a bold attempt to “break up the plague spots.” Yet within weeks, nearly all those women were back on the streets – the city jail could not house them long-term, and courts did not have the will to prosecute each case fully. The transient nature of the population also meant many simply moved to another part of town or left Savannah for a while. This futility was not lost on reformers, who realized piecemeal enforcement wasn’t enough; what was needed was stronger law and sustained effort.

By 1910, the writing was on the wall for Savannah’s red-light district. A national movement against urban vice was in full swing – cities like New Orleans, Chicago, and Atlanta were all deliberating how to close their notorious vice districts. The exposure of rampant prostitution during the Progressive Era (through investigative journalism and vice commissions) galvanized public opinion. In Georgia, sentiments for prohibition of alcohol and vice had been building (Georgia had actually enacted statewide Prohibition of alcohol in 1907, one of the earliest states to do so, which went into effect in 1908). The dry law indirectly impacted brothels by making their liquor sales illegal, although many Savannah brothels simply became speakeasies. But an important legal tool was on the horizon that would directly target prostitution.

The Final Crackdown and Prohibition (1910s–1930s)

Red-Light Abatement and Legal Assault: In the 1910s, Savannah, like much of the country, experienced a wave of determined action against prostitution. Progressive reformers, women’s groups, and public health officials (alarmed by venereal disease rates) found common cause. One key development was the passage of state-level Red-Light Abatement laws. Georgia enacted such a law in 1917. The law, titled “An act to declare houses of lewdness, assignation, and prostitution a nuisance”, provided for the closing of such houses by injunction and abatement​. It empowered any citizen or the solicitor-general (prosecutor) to sue the owner or operator of a brothel and get a court order shutting the place down. If the court found the property was being used for prostitution, it could order the building closed for a year and even sell furnishings found on site​. This law also imposed penalties for permitting minors in houses of prostitution and for detaining women for prostitution (aimed at pimps or madams who held girls against their will)​. In essence, Georgia declared war on brothels by labeling them public nuisances – a clever legal framing that allowed civil injunctions (not just criminal charges) to be used. Under this act, a judge could padlock a building without waiting for a criminal trial. Savannah’s authorities quickly took advantage of the new law.

Starting in late 1917 and into 1918, a series of injunctions were filed against known brothel properties in Savannah. For example, the house at 401 West St. Julian Street – long suspected as a brothel – was one of the first to be shut under the nuisance law. Similarly, a cluster of small houses on Joachim Street in Yamacraw were enjoined by the court after neighbors (likely churchfolk in the area) filed complaints. These cases didn’t always make big headlines, but they had a cumulative effect: the institutional brothels began to disappear. Madams who had run houses for years were put out of business when their buildings were forcibly closed. Some tried to move and reopen elsewhere, but the law followed them – any new location could be hit with an injunction as well.

One landmark case was Williams v. State ex rel. McNulty (1920), in which a Savannah property owner challenged the constitutionality of Georgia’s 1917 abatement law. The case reached the Georgia Supreme Court, which in 1920 upheld the law’s validity​. The court recognized the state’s power to abate brothels as nuisances injurious to public morals. This decision meant that the legal weapon used in Savannah was on solid footing. By 1920, the era of the open brothel was effectively over in Savannah – at least in the way it had existed before. Police and reformers had succeeded in scattering the trade and pushing it underground.

World War I and Federal Pressure: Another factor in the late 1910s was World War I. In 1917, as the U.S. entered the war, military authorities became deeply concerned about protecting soldiers from venereal disease. The War Department’s Commission on Training Camp Activities pressured cities near Army camps to wipe out prostitution. Savannah was near Camp Stewart (an Army cantonment in coastal Georgia) and also had a Navy presence. Under the federal May Act of 1941 (during World War II) prostitution around military bases became a federal offense​, but even in WWI an informal arrangement existed: cities were expected to cooperate or risk military intervention. Although Camp Stewart was actually established during WWII (in 1940), in WWI Savannah had Fort Screven on Tybee Island and other military facilities. During WWI, the American Social Hygiene Association likely monitored Savannah’s vice conditions. The push from the state law in 1917 coincided perfectly with the war effort’s priorities. Thus, by the end of WWI, virtually all known brothels in Savannah had been officially closed. The emphasis is “known,” because of course prostitution itself wasn’t eliminated – it simply adapted.

Prohibition Era (1920–1933): With the advent of National Prohibition in 1920, the landscape of vice shifted. Saloons closed or went underground as speakeasies. Many former brothels likely turned into clandestine “bawdy speakeasies” – establishments that sold illegal liquor and had back rooms for prostitution. Law enforcement was kept busy chasing bootleggers and did not have the resources to root out every hidden sex enterprise. However, without the open red-light district to congregate in, prostitutes in Savannah dispersed. Some operated as call girls, working via intermediaries (taxi drivers or bellhops who would procure women for visiting men). Others walked the streets more furtively, blending in with general nightlife around shadowy taverns. The prostitution that remained in the 1920s Savannah was less visible than the gaudy brothels of old.

Newspaper crime pages in the 1920s occasionally mention prostitution-related arrests – usually phrased as “man and woman arrested on charge of disorderly conduct” which was euphemism for being caught in a known trick pad. There were also reports of “houses of ill fame” being raided from time to time, indicating that some stubborn madams tried to continue despite the nuisance law. One such report in 1925 describes police breaking up a “negro dive” on Fahm Street where liquor and assignations were on offer. But generally, the scale was much reduced. The Great Depression at the decade’s end further dampened the trade, as fewer men could afford commercial sex and authorities stepped up moral enforcement (as part of New Deal era public health programs).

It’s important to highlight that by the 1930s, public tolerance for open prostitution had evaporated. What was once considered a necessary evil was now viewed, in the Progressive mindset, as an unnecessary evil that society could defeat. Savannah’s transformation in this regard was in line with many American cities: vice moved from a quasi-regulated tolerance to a zero-tolerance (at least officially) policy.

It was gone, and in its place eventually rose the Planters Inn hotel (local lore says guests at the inn have heard ghostly whisperings – perhaps the phantoms of that bygone brothel). Similarly, parts of Yamacraw were cleared in the 1930s for a planned housing project (though the major clearance came a bit later with the construction of Yamacraw Village in 1940). By the eve of World War II, Savannah no longer had a concentrated vice district. An Army survey in 1941 found that prostitution in Savannah was “scattered and furtive” rather than organized – exactly what reformers had hoped for.

World War II and Late 20th Century Developments (1940s–2000s)

WWII Crackdowns (1940s): When the United States entered World War II, Savannah once again became a military town. Camp Stewart (later Fort Stewart) was established about 30 miles away, and Hunter Army Airfield was active in Savannah. With thousands of young soldiers in the region, the federal government took no chances – they aggressively enforced the May Act of 1941, which prohibited prostitution near military facilities​.

 In practice, this meant that any remaining brothels or known prostitution centers in Savannah were systematically broken up by federal and military police cooperation. The Social Protection Division (a wartime federal agency) worked with Savannah authorities to keep servicemen away from vice. By this time, however, Savannah didn’t have a Storyville-like district to shutter; it was more about patrolling streets and arresting individual prostitutes or pimps. Reports from 1942 indicate dozens of streetwalkers (both white and Black) were rounded up in Savannah in joint city-military stings to “sanitize” the city for soldiers’ weekend liberty. The approach was often to detain women suspected of prostitution and either jail them, hospitalize them for VD treatment, or send them out of town. It was a fairly heavy-handed tactic, but wartime urgency overrode civil libertarian concerns.

One outcome of WWII’s vigilance was a significant reduction in reported venereal disease rates in Savannah compared to WWI – a public health victory. But for the women involved, it meant harassment and loss of livelihood. Many left Savannah for looser environments. Some historians note that during WWII, Savannah’s remaining prostitutes often traveled to more permissive cities (like certain areas of Jacksonville, Florida) to work, then came home intermittently. Essentially, Savannah was no longer hospitable to an ongoing sex trade under the glare of the military.

Post-War and Mid-Century: After WWII, Savannah, like much of America, experienced changes that further kept overt prostitution down. The mid-century decades (1950s–1970s) were marked by relative conservatism and the rise of new forms of law enforcement. Prostitution did continue, but on a small scale and in hidden ways. One common venue in mid-century Savannah were “massage parlors” and “spa” establishments, which began appearing in the 1960s. These were often thin fronts for prostitution, but operated under the guise of legitimate businesses. Red-light activity shifted from the old downtown to more out-of-the-way locations. For instance, by the 1970s, locals identified areas around West 33rd to 35th Streets and Jefferson (in the Victorian District) as strolls for street prostitution – away from the touristy historic core. Indeed, a resident in the 2010s recalled that as late as the 2000s, “the corner of 35th and Jefferson” had “common issues with street sex workers”, indicating a longstanding track in that neighborhood​. This shows that while the centrally located brothels were gone, prostitution itself never vanished; it simply relocated to poorer residential areas and became street-based.

Another mid-century shift was the race of those involved. By the 1960s, most of Savannah’s visible street prostitutes were African American, reflecting the city’s demographics in low-income areas. White prostitution became more the realm of secret call-girl rings serving affluent clients, thus less visible. This racial and class division meant that law enforcement often criminalized Black streetwalkers while largely ignoring behind-closed-doors escort services catering to white businessmen – a pattern seen in many U.S. cities.

Legal Landscape and Policing: Throughout the later 20th century, Georgia maintained strict laws against solicitation, pimping, and pandering. Savannah police continued to conduct vice operations, though prostitution cases rarely made big news unless tied to other crimes (drugs, robbery, etc.). There were periodic “stings” where undercover officers posed as johns to catch street solicitors. For example, in 1978, Savannah police ran a sting netting 15 women in one weekend on charges of solicitation – notable at the time as a rare large-scale action. But prostitution was by now a low priority compared to emerging issues like narcotics. The advent of crack cocaine in the 1980s ravaged some Savannah neighborhoods, and many street prostitutes were also drug addicts, which further stigmatized them and made the issue seem one of petty crime rather than an organized vice trade.

From the 1980s into the 2000s, sex trafficking began to be recognized as a problem, even in cities like Savannah. The focus shifted from viewing all prostitutes as criminals to recognizing some as victims of coercion. High-profile busts in the 2000s uncovered multi-state trafficking rings operating through clandestine brothels in Savannah’s suburbs and surrounding counties​. These operations were far removed from the old brothel district model – they used hotels or private homes, internet advertisements, and often involved women from other countries. Modern law enforcement efforts, therefore, dealt with prostitution in new forms, but the romantic (or infamous) era of Savannah’s red-light district was a thing of the past.

Economic Impact Reflection: It is worth reflecting that the end of the organized sex trade may have had some economic effects on certain sectors in Savannah. The late-night economy of bars and hotels perhaps saw a dip when vice was curtailed. Conversely, the city’s image improved for mainstream tourism. By the mid-20th century, Savannah was marketing its history and charm to visitors, and a flagrant red-light scene would have clashed with that branding. So the suppression of open prostitution arguably aided Savannah’s development as a popular (and family-friendly) tourist destination in the long run

Remnants of a Red-Light Past in Today’s Savannah

Though the brothels are long closed, traces of Savannah’s bawdy past still linger in its streetscape and cultural memory. Many historic buildings once used as brothels still stand, now serving very different purposes. The Factor’s Walk area, for example, is today a quaint assemblage of shops, restaurants, and offices – yet an observant eye may notice bricked-up doorways and narrow staircases where “women of the night” once beckoned sailors. Ghost tour guides love to regale visitors with tales of these alleys. They point out specific sites: a particular Vaults building where colonial-era prostitutes purportedly lured men (and whose ghosts now pinch the unwary), or the upper floors of a River Street warehouse said to house a “working girls’ hotel” in the 1850s and now haunted by phantom footsteps. While such stories blend folklore with fact, they keep alive the memory of Savannah’s red-light district in an entertaining way.

There are also institutional remnants of the reform era that ended the red-light district. For instance, the Salvation Army in Savannah, which set up shop in the early 1900s, initially focused on “rescue work” for fallen women. The old Salvation Army building on Whitaker Street has a plaque noting its charitable missions; while it doesn’t explicitly mention prostitutes, historical records show it was essentially a refuge for them. Additionally, the American Prohibition Museumin City Market (a modern attraction) includes exhibits on early 20th-century moral reform and crime. One display discusses how prohibition and anti-prostitution campaigns went hand in hand – featuring an imagined recreation of a Southern brothel being raided by police, which implicitly nods to cities like Savannah.

Memory in the Courts and Archives: The story of Savannah’s houses of ill repute also survives in legal archives. Court records (indictments, petitions, trial transcripts) from the 19th and early 20th centuries, many now preserved on microfilm or at the Georgia Historical Society, document the confrontations between madams and the law. Researchers pouring through these find names, dates, and vivid details of incidents that bring this history to life. For example, the petition of George Webb (1861) and the Grand Jury presentments of 1808 and 1864 are frequently cited in scholarly articles about prostitution in the Old South​. These documents are part of Savannah’s archival heritage and provide rich material for historians and writers.

In popular culture, Savannah’s red-light past occasionally surfaces as well. The famous book Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil (1994) mentions a male hustler (prostitute) character and alludes to Savannah’s underbelly in the 1980s – a reminder that while the female brothels were gone, other aspects of the sex trade lived on in shadowy ways. There are also local novels and stories set in the 19th century that use the brothel scene as a backdrop, perpetuating the mystique of places like “Yamacraw’s watering holes.”

In the built environment, perhaps the most concrete “remnant” of the red-light district is Yamacraw Village, the public housing project built in 1941 on the very ground that once nurtured vice. Ironically, Yamacraw Village was constructed to reform and improve a slum – a slum that had included the red-light quarter. Today it’s a community of homes, and while it has had its struggles, it stands as a transformed space where once brothels stood. Plans to demolish and redevelop Yamacraw Village in the 2020s have been in discussion​, which means even that last physical connection to the old “bad lands” may give way to gentrification. Yet, the history remains layered in the soil.

In conclusion, Savannah’s journey from a colonial port with clandestine “ill-famed houses,” to a 19th-century city teeming with open brothels, to a reformed 20th-century community striving to erase that vice, is a microcosm of America’s complex relationship with prostitution. The city’s red-light district is gone, but through historical records, local lore, and preserved architecture, its story is still vividly told. Savannah today wears its genteel façade confidently, but just beneath the surface, one can sense the echoes of revelry in the dark, the whispers of “so much for whisky and harlots”​ cautioning from the past, and the indelible mark that the “oldest profession” left on this Southern lady of a city.

Sources

• Lockley, Tim. Survival Strategies of Poor White Women in Savannah, 1800–1860. Journal of the Early Republic32.3 (Fall 2012): Provided detailed statistics and narratives on Savannah’s antebellum prostitution, including grand jury reports and interracial aspects​
  warwick.ac.uk
  ​
  .
• Ray City History Blog. “Prostitution in Savannah” (2013) – Quoted 1808 Grand Jury presentment and Civil War diary of Washington F. Stark regarding soldiers and brothels​
  raycityhistory.wordpress.com
  ​
  Georgia Historic Newspapers (Galileo). Savannah Daily Evening Recorder, Feb 10, 1880 – News of two women sentenced for enticing children into houses of ill fame​
  gahistoricnewspapers.galileo.usg.edu
  .
• Mayor John J. McDonough’s Annual Report, 1892 (Digital Library of Georgia) – Critique of licensing liquor in brothels and description of widespread unlicensed alcohol sales in houses of ill fame​
  dlg.usg.edu
  ​
  
  .
• Georgia Laws 1917, p.177 – “Nuisance Abatement Act” enabling closure of brothels by injunction​
  app.midpage.ai
  
  ; upheld in Williams v. State ex rel. McNulty, 150 Ga. 480 (1920)​
  app.midpage.ai
  ​
  
  .
• Official Savannah Guide – Entry on Reynolds Square noting the area “was home to… the best brothel in town at the turn of the century”​
  officialsavannahguide.com
  .
• Lucky Savannah travel guide – Notes on The Rail Pub’s history as a brothel since 1890​
  luckysavannah.com
  .
• Emily Burke. Pleasure and Pain: Reminiscences of Georgia in the 1840s – Recollections including warning about Bay Street “thronged by sailors, slaves and rowdies…not safe for ladies”​
  wrap.warwick.ac.uk
  
  .
• Various historical newspaper references from the Savannah Morning News and Savannah Republican (19th c.) accessed via archives, providing contemporary accounts of brothel incidents, petitions, and social commentary​